Shop
Support
Community
TechCenter
Home
Topics: All
Wikis
Forums
Blogs
Video
TechChat
Events
About
TechCenter
Dell Community
Search Options
Search Everything
Search Virtualization
TechCenter
>
Virtualization
>
Virtualization - Forum
>
RAID5 Vs. RAID6 for Win2008R2 host running Hyper-V
Join
Sign in
RAID5 Vs. RAID6 for Win2008R2 host running Hyper-V
Virtualization
Home
Forum
Wiki
Forum Thread Details
1
Reply
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 2 years ago
Forums Links
Subscribe via RSS
RAID5 Vs. RAID6 for Win2008R2 host running Hyper-V
rated by 0 users
This post has
1 Reply |
0
Followers
Posted by
jjdbl
on
28 Jan 2010 2:11 PM
rated by 0 users
RAID5 Vs. RAID6 for Win2008R2 host running Hyper-V
Looking for recommendations on what RAID setup to use on a T610, PERC6i controller. We typically use RAID1-OS and RAID5-Data in our enviornment and heard that RAID6 will give us better redundancy at a cost of performance. Our current PE2900 servers setup with Win2003 host and VMware Server with a RAID1-OS and RAID5-Data, (virtual disks are located on the Data partition) tend to give us VM performance issues as it is. We currently have local backup to disk in addition to remote backups and would like to know if the performance hit is worth the added redundancy.
experts
,
best practice
,
Virtualization_DTC_F
,
design
,
virtualization
,
community
,
DTC_JS
Posted by
DELL-Scott H
on
29 Jan 2010 2:28 PM
rated by 0 users
RE: RAID5 Vs. RAID6 for Win2008R2 host running Hyper-V
Depends. What type of IO ? Reads vs Writes / size of IO requests. You'll give up a little in RAID-6 - great performance paper on the PERC here that should help -->
http://www.delltechcenter.com/page/PERC+6+Performance+Analysis+Report
Best way to improve disk performance is to add spindles. How many are currently in your RAID5-Data right now ? You'll also need to be conscience of how may VMs you are putting per LUN and what they may be doing to cause spindle contention.
Page 1 of 1 (2 items)