Re: Overclocking the Auroras?
11 Nov 2009 08:33PM
Itachi,
1) Alienware charged a premium yes, but this wasn't JUST a name thing. Components that were used were of a higher manufacturing quality. For example, lets use a camshaft from a car. In theory all camshafts are the same, they function the same basic way, and do the same job. However, depending on the manufacturing process and materials used, they can vary greatly in overall quality and ability. Same applies to computer hardware.
Alienware was known for using parts that were more towards the high quality end. The parts that I'm seeing in my Aurora do not seem to be of the best quality from what I can tell.
That's not the say they are junk, jsut that they are not what I would expect from a product with the Alienware name on it. How would you like to pay a premium price for a Porsche only to find out it had a budget Honda engine in it? Same principle.
2) In regard to dells sales strategy of trying to get people to spend more for a faster stock processor in order to have better overclocking ability, you seem to miss the entire point of overclocking all together. Overclocking is about using the least expensive hardware and getting it to run as well as or better than the most expensive .
If the option comes down to 1) Paying $2000 for a 920 that is being limited by the bios, 2) $3000+ for a 975 this is limited by the bios (but not as much), and 3) paying $2000 (maybe less for a 920 that is NOT limited by the bios.... I think the choice is obvious.
See, this entire thing about forcing customers to "buy up" in order to get extra performance only works if EVERYONE had the same practice. However, since there are others that do not do this, you have the option to buy from someone else.
In the long run the "great idea that is supposed to make dell lots more money" only results in a loss of business. It results in lthe loss of customer loyalty, trust, and business.
A much better business plan would have been to unlock the bios, let people have what they thought (and were told) they were buying... ther eby creating a happy customer who is much more likely to come back in the future.
That's the issue with a lot of companies now (particularly larger ones). They are too short sided. All they think about is what benefits them in the moment. That might be all good and fine for today... but what about tomorrow when no one comes back?
3) The 920's and 975's come from the same silicon. There are slight variations in quality, but it is very minuscule. Essentially the 920's and 975's are the same exact chip... the difference is the multiplier (which is locked on the 920 to a max of 21x). This is the reason why lower base speed CPU's can be overclocked to a higher % over their base clock than the more expensive (higher clocked) models of that line. The 975 is nothing more but a pre-oc'd 920. Most people are ignorant to this fact, hence why Intel can get away with the charging scheme they can. Essentially they are doing the same thing Dell is... but look around.... how many people that OC actually use the 975? Not a whole lot. The majority are using the 920's and such, because it just makes more sense.
4) If I had a 975... I would overclock it. Because I can.
I don't NEED a motorcycle that goes 200mph... but I have one... because I might suddenly feel the urge to go that fast.
5) Todays top of the line system is tomorrows garbage. That's another reason to OC... you get a bit more life out of an old system.
Trust me, if you know how to... you will eventually OC your computer. It's inevitable.